Circumcised can have difficult to cum šŸ¤”šŸ˜µā€šŸ’«

humananimal

Esteemed Citizen of ZV
Observation from many interspecies videos :
In this forum it seems to me that most men are cumming with their cocks halfway in her pussy, while I prefer as deep as possible.
My conjecture is that the difference is because the circumcised men need more stimulation to cum, and therefore has to move in her outer part where there is more friction to the glans (head). While on unharmed men the foreskin glides back and he can feel her vagina all the way inside her.
Am I wrong or what ?
 
Last edited:
Circumcision does desensitize, but unless someone was circumcised as an adult no one would have the objective ability to definitively say how it is to cum intact vs cut.

Regardless, shallow cumming is standard in porn so you can get the money shot of the dripping hole.
 
Circumcision does desensitize, but unless someone was circumcised as an adult no one would have the objective ability to definitively say how it is to cum intact vs cut.

Regardless, shallow cumming is standard in porn so you can get the money shot of the dripping hole.
Yes, I have thought of that, the porn industry. But a number of the videos seems to me to be ā€˜homemadeā€™, and there I see it too.
 
Observation: First, they really gotta get it wet first, because it's always dry like regular skin. Then it gets more sensitive. Second, if you're not cut, and want to find out just how desensitizing it is to be circumcised, find a way to pin your foreskin back. And see how long you can stand it. I never made it more than a day or so. The friction against clothing really starts to burn. Some guys that do this intentionally to satisfy their wife or something have reported the skin drying out and cracking to the point of bleeding. They use lotion constantly.
 
Observation: First, they really gotta get it wet first, because it's always dry like regular skin. Then it gets more sensitive. Second, if you're not cut, and want to find out just how desensitizing it is to be circumcised, find a way to pin your foreskin back. And see how long you can stand it. I never made it more than a day or so. The friction against clothing really starts to burn. Some guys that do this intentionally to satisfy their wife or something have reported the skin drying out and cracking to the point of bleeding. They use lotion constantly.
WTF? I'm circumcised. No, I do not have to get it very wet. No, my cock does not dry out and crack. Never have I used lotion for the skin. Yes, it's desensitized but then again I'll fuck 3 times longer than you sensitive pricks. And I don't have to worry about my dick smelling like rotten cheese. Lol
 
Honestly, I can't imagine putting a baby through that, but they can't stop their parents from letting some fool potentially mutilate them. What can a baby do? Say no? Naw, they just cry. Unless a foreskin has grown wrong and causes problems, no dude with an intact functioning foreskin would ever want to remove theirs, unless maybe they never jacked off before.
 
Last edited:
What? Circumcised dicks have a lower chance of getting HIV. And I know a few guys that got circumcised in their twenties and don't regret it. I've always thought uncircumcised dicks looked disgusting and weird especially when it looks like
beaker-muppet.gif
 
WTF? I'm circumcised. No, I do not have to get it very wet. No, my cock does not dry out and crack. Never have I used lotion for the skin. Yes, it's desensitized but then again I'll fuck 3 times longer than you sensitive pricks. And I don't have to worry about my dick smelling like rotten cheese. Lol
Glad that you donā€™t have problems.
About the smell, well, if no washing you will smell. Thats why we uses tootbrushes, washes armpits, groins, feets a.s.o.

Zoophiles never gets HIV šŸ˜‡

About the look - like so many other things It is what one has become accustomed to.
Like many girls / woman find it strange or even ugly if their pussy donā€™t look like a child. It is the same.
 
Last edited:
What? Circumcised dicks have a lower chance of getting HIV. And I know a few guys that got circumcised in their twenties and don't regret it. I've always thought uncircumcised dicks looked disgusting and weird especially when it looks like
beaker-muppet.gif
šŸ˜”

Uncircumsized dicks do NOT have a higher chance of getting or transmitting HIV. That myth has been proven wrong a long time.
 
WTF? I'm circumcised. No, I do not have to get it very wet. No, my cock does not dry out and crack. Never have I used lotion for the skin. Yes, it's desensitized but then again I'll fuck 3 times longer than you sensitive pricks. And I don't have to worry about my dick smelling like rotten cheese. Lol
Nobody was aiming to insult you dude. Your ego is clearly more sensitive than your cock, and your quick and over-response without thought puts you well below 3x longer. You wanna put yourself in a minority of ultra-wet skinless dudes go a-head, but if you take care of your cock like I take care of mine and probably the rest of the guys here do, your cock is probably about as dry and smelling of rotten cheese as the rest of us. But, thanks for passing on that misinformation. That's all I'm saying.
 
Nobody was aiming to insult you dude. Your ego is clearly more sensitive than your cock, and your quick and over-response without thought puts you well below 3x longer. You wanna put yourself in a minority of ultra-wet skinless dudes go a-head, but if you take care of your cock like I take care of mine and probably the rest of the guys here do, your cock is probably about as dry and smelling of rotten cheese as the rest of us. But, thanks for passing on that misinformation. That's all I'm saying.
I'm insulted by the idiocy that y'all can't tell that I was pulling your chain. You're the ones spreading bullshit about have to get it very wet, lotions and cracking dicks. Obviously, being uncut means low IQ. Lol
 
I've shown you legitimate reports and studies that I'm right. Show me references (real ones) that what I've said about HIV is a myth. Bet you can't.
 
The numbers seem impressive in this 15 years old paper.
BUT the reader has no way to make his own judgment. There is the numbers of men in two surveys, but not how many in fact got HIV.
And in any reliable journal there is always a statistically calculation to show how likely the result is. If it is not there it will be dismissed.
AND the survey is about adult men who was circumcised ! How were they found ?, I canā€™t imagine that they accepted to participate in a project where lots are drawn - unless promised a substantial payment.
Looked in New England Medical Journal and others. It seems they advice men in areas with high HIV risk could be circumcised.
They donā€™t know why it should help. I could think of a number of reasons, including that a less soft penil head is more resistant.
I have in my time at the clinic (europe) referred a few adult men because of some for og foreskin constriction. I have never met one who wanted it done for other reasons including to prevent infections.
So I doubt that the men in the non-circumcised and the circumcised group can be compared at all.
 
Last edited:
The numbers seem impressive in this 15 years old paper.
BUT the reader has no way to make his own judgment. There is the numbers of men in two surveys, but not how many in fact got HIV.
And in any reliable journal there is always a statistically calculation to show how likely the result is. If it is not there it will be dismissed.
AND the survey is about adult men who was circumcised ! How were they found ?, I canā€™t imagine that they accepted to participate in a project where lots are drawn - unless promised a substantial payment.
Looked in New England Medical Journal and others. It seems they advice men in areas with high HIV risk could be circumcised.
They donā€™t know why it should help. I could think of a number of reasons, including that a less soft penil head is more resistant.
I have in my time at the clinic (europe) referred a few adult men because of some for og foreskin constriction. I have never met one who wanted it done for other reasons including to prevent infections.
So I doubt that the men in the non-circumcised and the circumcised group can be compared at all.
Yadda yadda. I don't care what you have to say about it. Show me studies and reports that say it's a myth. You can't.
 


Want more?
 
Observation from many interspecies videos :
In this forum it seems to me that most men are cumming with their cocks halfway in her pussy, while I prefer as deep as possible.
My conjecture is that the difference is because the circumcised men need more stimulation to cum, and therefore has to move in her outer part where there is more friction to the glans (head). While on unharmed men the foreskin glides back and he can feel her vagina all the way inside her.
Am I wrong or what ?
I began this thread in wondering about an observation on videos, where it seemed that circumcised men did it different when cumming.

So I suggest that we go back to the topic. The discussion about HIV / circumcision could be started in a new thread.

And as other zoophile I donā€™t contract HIV from my partner šŸ˜‡
 
Back
Top